Com v. M.M. (DUI)

Commonwealth v. M.M. (ARD Hearing - DUI)

Case Summary:  Defendant  was pulled over on the basis of allegedly failing to stop at a red light.  Subsequently he was charged with Driving Under the Influence of Alcoholand Careless Driving.  

Disposition:  Defendant was admitted into the Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition (A.R.D.) Program.  After completing all necessary requirements and conditions of the Program, Defendant's case will be Expunged.  No Conviction.

Com v G.G-C (Preliminary Hearing) - Drug Charges

9/25/2012

Commonwealth v. G.G-C. (Preliminary Hearing)

Charge/Violation:      35 §780-113 §§A31- Possession of Marijuana - (Misdemeanor)

                                                35 §780-113 §§A32- Use/Possession of Drug Paraph. - (Misdemeanor)

                                    18§ 6310.3 §§A - Carry False Identification Card (Minor). - (Summary)

                                    75 §4302 §§A1 - Period for Requiring Lighted Lamps - (Summary)

                                    18§ 5503 §§A4 - Disorder Conduct Hazardous/Physi. Off. - (Summary)

 

Case Summary:  Defendant, a student at the University of Pittsburgh, was charged with numerous crimes including Possession of Marijuana - a Misdemeanor offense. 

Disposition:  At the Preliminary Hearing in Pittsburgh Municipal Court, Attorney Paletta worked out an agreement with the District Attorney and the Officer.  Defendant plead guilty to 1 count of Disorderly Conduct, which was moved to a Non-Traffic docket.  All other charges, including the Misdemeanor offenses of Possession of Marijuana and Possession of Drug Paraphernalia were Withdrawn.

Com v. D.H. (Drug Charges, Confidential Informant)

6/5/12

Commonwealth v. D.H.

(Non-Jury Trial)

Charges: 

2 counts – Manufacture, Delivery or Possession with Intent to Deliver – Felony

            1 count – Possession of a Controlled Substance - Misdemeanor

Case Facts:   

                       With the use of a Confidential Informant, Police allege that Defendant was involved in activity related to the above charges. 

Verdict:

The Commonwealth DISMISSED their case against Defendant and ALL CHARGES WERE NOLLE PROSSED.  Defendant was not convicted of any crime.